Printer-friendly version

Contributed by Lisa Evans 2009-10-20

Portland — The benefits touted by the supporters of Question 2 written by the Maine Heritage Policy Center miss the mark. The results of cutting the excise tax by 55% for vehicles less than 6 years old is not going to help low-income drivers in Maine because they are not the ones purchasing new, expensive cars. This is a perfect example of another tax break that benefits those who need the least help.

If someone is purchasing a new car, a Prius for example, then what are a few hundred extra dollars? They could simply negotiate a little harder to save that money if they need it, or buy something less expensive. Either way, its doubtful it will make or break their decision to buy a new car.

We should be giving the break to those who really need it and driving cars that are 6+ years old. Better yet, eliminate the tax for all cars over 8 years old. Perhaps they could use that money towards passing their State Inspection.

All in all we know where the difference will be made up:decreased city services. Recent winters have shown us what its like to have fewer snow plows clearing the roads during a big storm. When the snow starts piling up I would much rather have paid the excise tax on my 5 year old car than be stuck in a snow bank or waiting for the plow to come down my street.